Legal Alert | June 2022

DOWNLOAD ALERT

On 12 June 2022, the Government issued Decree No. 38/2022/ND-CP (“Decree 38/2022”) prescribing regional minimum wages applicable to employees working under labour contracts. Decree 38/2022 will take effect from 01 July 2022 and supersede Decree 90/2019/ND-CP with notable new points that are attracting the attention of enterprises and employees:

1. Increase monthly minimum wages

Decree 38/2022 prescribes that monthly minimum wages for employees are increased as follows:

  • Region I: VND 4,680,000 (an increase of VND 260,000 compared to the previous level).
  • Region II: VND 4,160,000 (an increase of VND 240,000 compared to the previous level).
  • Region III: VND 3,640,000 (an increase of VND 210,000 compared to the previous level).
  • Region IV: VND 3,250,000 (an increase of VND 180,000 compared to the previous level).

The detailed list of geographical areas is provided in the Appendix issued in attachment to Decree 38/2022.

2. Application of hourly minimum wages

For the first time, Decree 38/2022 prescribes the hourly minimum wages, although the hourly minimum wages have been mentioned in both Labour Codes 2012 and 2019. Accordingly, the hourly minimum wage is the lowest salary used as a basis for negotiating and paying wages to hourly-paid employees, ensuring that the salary paid according to the employee’s job or title (for each hour of working and completion of the amount of work as agreed) will not be less than the hourly minimum wages.

The hourly minimum wages for employees according to the List of geographical areas are specified in the Appendix issued in attachment to Decree 38/2022 as follows:

  • Region I: VND 22,500;
  • Region II: VND 20,000;
  • Region III: VND 17,500; and
  • Region IV: VND 15,600.

 

3. Abolish the regulation that the minimum wages for those who have finished vocational training or apprenticeship are increased by 7%

According to Article 4.1 of Decree 38/2022, the monthly minimum wage is the lowest salary used as a basis for negotiating and paying wages to monthly-paid employees, ensuring that the salary paid according to the employee’s job or title (working for full hours in a month and completion of the amount of work as agreed) will not be less than the monthly minimum wages.

Thus, compared with Decree 90/2019/ND-CP, Decree 38/2022 has removed the regulation that employees assuming jobs that require vocational training or apprenticeship (i.e. having a vocational degree, high school, college, university degrees, etc.) will be paid at least 7% higher than the prescribed regional minimum wage. Therefore, paying wages at least 7% higher than the regional minimum wage for employees who have undergone vocational training or apprenticeship is no longer compulsory for employers.

In addition to the notable new points mentioned above, Decree 38/2022 also adjusts the geographical areas where regional minimum wages are applied, such as: adding Thu Duc city in Ho Chi Minh city to Region I, moving Ha Long city in Quang Ninh province, and Xuan Loc district in Dong Nai province from Region II to Region I, etc.

Rate this post

The post Legal Alert | June 2022 appeared first on Global Vietnam Lawyers.



source https://gvlawyers.com.vn/legal-alert-june-2022-2/

Legal Alert | June 2022

DOWNLOAD ALERT

On 12 June 2022, the Government issued Decree No. 38/2022/ND-CP (“Decree 38/2022”) prescribing regional minimum wages applicable to employees working under labour contracts. Decree 38/2022 will take effect from 01 July 2022 and supersede Decree 90/2019/ND-CP with notable new points that are attracting the attention of enterprises and employees:

1. Increase monthly minimum wages

Decree 38/2022 prescribes that monthly minimum wages for employees are increased as follows:

  • Region I: VND 4,680,000 (an increase of VND 260,000 compared to the previous level).
  • Region II: VND 4,160,000 (an increase of VND 240,000 compared to the previous level).
  • Region III: VND 3,640,000 (an increase of VND 210,000 compared to the previous level).
  • Region IV: VND 3,250,000 (an increase of VND 180,000 compared to the previous level).

The detailed list of geographical areas is provided in the Appendix issued in attachment to Decree 38/2022.

2. Application of hourly minimum wages

For the first time, Decree 38/2022 prescribes the hourly minimum wages, although the hourly minimum wages have been mentioned in both Labour Codes 2012 and 2019. Accordingly, the hourly minimum wage is the lowest salary used as a basis for negotiating and paying wages to hourly-paid employees, ensuring that the salary paid according to the employee’s job or title (for each hour of working and completion of the amount of work as agreed) will not be less than the hourly minimum wages.

The hourly minimum wages for employees according to the List of geographical areas are specified in the Appendix issued in attachment to Decree 38/2022 as follows:

  • Region I: VND 22,500;
  • Region II: VND 20,000;
  • Region III: VND 17,500; and
  • Region IV: VND 15,600.

3. Abolish the regulation that the minimum wages for those who have finished vocational training or apprenticeship are increased by 7%

According to Article 4.1 of Decree 38/2022, the monthly minimum wage is the lowest salary used as a basis for negotiating and paying wages to monthly-paid employees, ensuring that the salary paid according to the employee’s job or title (working for full hours in a month and completion of the amount of work as agreed) will not be less than the monthly minimum wages.

Thus, compared with Decree 90/2019/ND-CP, Decree 38/2022 has removed the regulation that employees assuming jobs that require vocational training or apprenticeship (i.e. having a vocational degree, high school, college, university degrees, etc.) will be paid at least 7% higher than the prescribed regional minimum wage. Therefore, paying wages at least 7% higher than the regional minimum wage for employees who have undergone vocational training or apprenticeship is no longer compulsory for employers.

In addition to the notable new points mentioned above, Decree 38/2022 also adjusts the geographical areas where regional minimum wages are applied, such as: adding Thu Duc city in Ho Chi Minh city to Region I, moving Ha Long city in Quang Ninh province, and Xuan Loc district in Dong Nai province from Region II to Region I, etc.

Rate this post

The post Legal Alert | June 2022 appeared first on Global Vietnam Lawyers.



source https://gvlawyers.com.vn/legal-alert-june-2022/

Legal Newsletter Issue No. 6 | June 2022

Dear Valued Customers and Partners,

GV Lawyers would like to introduce you Legal Newsletter Issue No. 06, in June 2022 with the following main contents:

  • The extension of time limit for paying land taxes and rent as well as the interest rate subsidies from the Budget will be issues in which businesses, cooperatives and business households are currently very interested. You can refer to these regulations in detail in the “Latest regulations” section.
  • How will compliance with the regulation on “dialogue in the workplace” be a trending topic of many businesses? In the article “Dialogue in the workplace and democracy regulations”, Lawyer Dinh Quang Thuan, Partner of GV Lawyers and Lawyer Hoang Phuoc will analyze the legal provisions related to dialogue in the workplace so that businesses can draw experiences from specific cases.
  • Insurance enterprises will be disallowed to invest in real estate business! This is a high-profile provision in the Law on Insurance Business (amended) recently passed by the National Assembly. The grading of FDI enterprises to decide on incentives is based on the set of criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of the FDI sector that the Ministry of Planning and Investment is drafting in “Good readings for you” section.
  • In the section “Legal Guidance“, we will update the questions related to tax policy such as: (i) Determination of personal income tax-free income for overtime salaries; (ii) To reduce value-added taxes on warehouse services and land rental; (iii) Corporate income tax reduction according to Decree No. 92/2021/ND-CP; and (iv) Instructions for handling incorrect invoices.
  • The last part of the Legal Newsletter is, as usual, the list of selected latest legal documents issued.

We hope you will find this newsletter useful. To read the full Legal Newsletter, please click DOWNLOAD.

Rate this post

The post Legal Newsletter Issue No. 6 | June 2022 appeared first on Global Vietnam Lawyers.



source https://gvlawyers.com.vn/legal-newsletter-issue-no-6-june-2022/

M&A Risk in Vietnam – Can share deals and asset deals be used interchangeably?

GV Lawyers would like to introduce our valued readers an article by Mr. Luong Van Ly – Senior Adviser and Mr. Tran Thanh Tung – Partner titled “M&A Risk in Vietnam – Can share deals and asset deals be used interchangeably ?” posted on IHC Magazine Vol 1 Issue 9, 2022.

***

SHARE DEALS AND ASSET DEALS

In a typical M&A operation, shares or assets of the target company may be assigned from the seller to the buyer. In a share deal, the buyer’s aim is to become one of the owners or the new owner of the target company by acquiring part or the whole of its equity capital. In an asset deal, the buyer acquires assets of the target company and is not, in principle, to have any stakes in its ownership. Both share deals and asset deals are legally recognised by the Law on Investment, Law on Enterprises and relevant regulations in Vietnam.

Quite often in practice, however, share deals and asset deals are interchangeable: the parties would go for a share deal if they discovered an asset deal to be complicated or time-consuming. From the view of the buyers and sellers, share and asset deals are equally valid and lawful options for them to structure their deals, depending on which one will provide them with the largest benefits.

Such practice may be observed in Vietnam, although, statistically, share deals outnumber asset deals. By contrast, it appears that the relevant State authorities, especially the courts, are somehow very reluctant to accept such business practice. Risks in M&A deals arise therefrom.

A CONSERVATIVE JUDICIAL PRECEDENT

In August 2020, in a case adjudicated on appeal by the High Court in Ho Chi Minh City, the target company was a one-member limited liability company wholly owned by the plaintiff (the Company). On 10 June 2014, the plaintiff and the respondent signed a capital contribution agreement (the CCA) whereby they agreed to contribute additional capital to the Company to increase its charter capital by VND70 billion, from VND30 billion to VND100 billion.

Under the CCA, the parties agreed that VND14 billion in total was to be contributed by the parties, whereby the plaintiff would contribute VND4.2 billion (accounting for 30%) while the respondent would contribute VND9.8 billion (accounting for 70%). For some reason, the respondent actually contrib­uted VND10.3 billion (instead of VND9.8 billion). Subsequently, the respondent agreed to disburse another VND74.6 billion into the charter capital of the Company in order to own 85% of the charter capital of the Company. In addition, upon full payment of the respondent’s share in the Company’s additional capital, the respondent would have the “full right to implement the project of the Company ”, i.e. full control of the implementa­tion and development of the project. However, the respondent ended up paying only VND10.5 billion in total.

The plaintiff thereupon initiated a lawsuit against the respondent seeking a court’s ruling not to recognise the respondent as an equity member of the Company for the reason that she failed to fully pay her pledged amount of capital. The respondent, in turn, submitted a counterclaim alleging that the plaintiff had likewise failed to fulfil his obligation to contribute charter capital.

In the appellate stage, the High Procuracy found that, based on the case documents, the real transaction between the plaintiff and the respondent was the transfer of part of a project of the Company. The High Procuracy then commented that transfer of project is an ”against the law” transaction and that the transaction, as per the CCA, was a sham transaction meant to conceal the real one (i.e. the project transfer).

In unison with the High Procuracy, the High Court declared the CCA null and void and ordered the plaintiff to return the amount of VND10.5 billion to the respondent.

In this case, the respondent might have wanted to acquire the majority stake in the company’s project but the parties had structured the deal as a share deal where the respondent contributed additional funds into the charter capital of the company. This structure is quite a popular practice in M&A deal structuring. However, the Procuracy and the Court seemingly took a very conservative point of view by considering the parties’ choice of a share deal to indirectly acquire the company’s project as a legal means to evade the laws. If this case is to become a formal precedent, other similar M&A deals might be at risk of not being recognised as lawful.

WHEN THE STATE AUTHORITY DOES NOT AGREE ON WHAT YOU HAVE PLANNED

In other M&A cases, lots of high-ranking State officers have been sentenced to jail on accusations of selling the shares of State-owned companies at “(too) low prices”. As a typical feature, the State-owned companies would hold the freehold or leasehold of high-value land (“đất vàng” or “golden land”) and private buyers would acquire majority shares in such companies to indirectly own the land. To determine whether the assignment price of the shares was “low” or “high”, the investigators would normally compare the said assignment price with the actual value of the “golden land” while, ironically, ignoring the debt duties of the target companies. In cases where the assignment price is found to be lower than the value of the “golden land”, the difference will be considered as a damage caused to the State and the related parties will be financially liable for such so-called damage. In some cases, the parties may even be held criminally responsible and the buyers (who are often private businesspersons) may have the the money they have paid for acquiring the companies’ shares in the first place confiscated. This amounts to unfair and inequitable treatment since, technically, the buyers just paid for what the owner of the target companies consented to sell.

However, we have not seen any cases where buyers or sellers in an M&A deal relating to a private company have been held criminally responsible for buying or selling shares at (too) low prices. Neither have we seen any cases of buyers or sellers canceling an M&A deal just because the transfer price is deemed to be (too) low by either party.

WHAT SHOULD BE LEARNT FROM VIETNAM PRACTICE

It can be seen that M&A deals in Vietnam seem to be riskier than in other countries, espe­cially when the target companies are either wholly or partly State-owned. Since land is the main asset of most of these companies, it may be argued that the reason therefore is the inadequacies in the laws on land and/or prop­erty. Others would blame the lack of business mindedness of the State authorities, especially the courts. Whatever the true reasons may be, the situation is not expected to change significantly in the short term. Therefore, generally speaking, before embarking upon any M&A deals, comprehensive and thorough due diligence, careful deal structuring, and assistance of the right consultant would be recommended. Where the target company is a State-owned company or the target project belongs wholly or partly to a State-owned company, double vigilance is not superfluous.

Click HERE to download the article.

Rate this post

The post M&A Risk in Vietnam – Can share deals and asset deals be used interchangeably? appeared first on Global Vietnam Lawyers.



source https://gvlawyers.com.vn/ma-risk-in-vietnam-can-share-deals-and-asset-deals-be-used-interchangeably/

Legal Alert | May 2022

DOWNLOAD ALERT

The State Bank of Vietnam is collecting opinions on the Draft Circular on conditions for foreign loans by enterprises not guaranteed by the Government (“Draft”). This is a draft that is of great interest to the business community.

This legal update provides a number of notable provisions in the Draft that affect enterprises:

1. Purpose of foreign loans

According to Articles 5, 12 and 15 of the Draft, the Borrower must specify the purpose of foreign loans in the Plan on using foreign loans, specifically as follows:

  • For the Borrower being a credit institution or foreign bank branch (CI):

The Borrower is allowed to borrow abroad to serve the purpose of supplementing capital sources for the Borrower’s lawful business activities; or restructuring the existing foreign loans of the Borrower. Specific information on the purpose of using foreign loans must be specified in the Plan on using foreign loans.

  • For the Borrower being an enterprise (not CI):

Borrowers are allowed to borrow short-term foreign loans to pay short-term debts that are obligated to pay within 12 months of signing the foreign loan agreement. For medium and long-term foreign loans, the Borrower is allowed to borrow to serve the purpose of (i) implementing its investment project; (ii) increasing the capital scale for its legitimate production and business; and (iii) restructuring existing foreign loans of the Borrower.

Enterprises must detail the purpose of foreign loans in the Plan on using foreign loans, including Information on production and business activities within the legal scope of activities of the Borrower that will use foreign loans; List of short-term debts that are obligated to pay within 12 months of signing the foreign loan agreement that the Borrower plans to use foreign loans to pay (for short-term foreign loans.)

  • For borrowing purposes to structure the Borrower’s existing foreign loans, including: Information on existing foreign loans (loan amount, loan term, loan terms and conditions) and proof that existing foreign loans comply with at the time of loan implementation.

2. Foreign loan cost ceiling

The cost of foreign loans shall be agreed upon by the Borrower, the Lender and related parties, but under no circumstance shall exceed the following cost ceilings:

  • For loans in foreign currencies, the maximum loan cost ceiling is as follows:
    • For loans using reference interest rate: reference interest rate + 8%/year.
    • For loans without using reference interest rate: SOFR Term Rate + 8%/year.

SOFR Term Rate is the 6-month SOFR Term interest rate announced by CME on its official website, determined at the nearest time to the signing date of foreign loan agreements and other agreements on amendments and supplements related to foreign loan costs.

  • For loans in VND: Vietnamese Government bond interest rate + 8%/year.

Vietnamese Government bond interest rate is the exercise interest rate of a 10-year government bond in Vietnamese dong at the nearest time to the date of signing foreign loan agreement and agreements on amendments and supplements related to foreign loan costs.

3. Enterprises must conduct foreign currency derivative transactions when borrowing foreign capital

According to Article 10 of the Draft, the Borrower must conduct foreign currency derivative transactions when borrowing foreign capital according to the following principles:

Transactions generating foreign currency Short-term foreign loans Medium and long term foreign loans
Loan turnover/ Principal repayment amount Having a loan turnover of over USD 500,000 or another foreign currency of equivalent value. Remittances to repay principal with a value of over USD 500,000 or another foreign currency of equivalent value.
Implementation time Before or at the time of withdrawal of the loan. At least 3 months before the principal repayment date.
Minimum transaction value Equal to 30% of the withdrawal value. Equal to 30% of the principal repayment amount.
Transaction term In line with the plan of repaying short-term foreign loans. Consistent with the principal repayment plan of medium and long-term foreign loans.

The requirement on performing foreign currency derivatives does not apply in the following cases: (i) The borrower is a credit institution that is permitted to conduct business and provide foreign exchange services in accordance with current laws; or (ii) The borrower expects to have sufficient foreign currency revenue to repay the loan.

4. Guarantee conditions for foreign loans

According to Article 8 of the Draft, the Borrower and related parties agree on security transactions for the foreign loans on the principle of self-responsibility to comply with the current law on secured transactions and other relevant legislation.

However, if the foreign loan has collateral in the territory of Vietnam, the lender and related parties must use a representative organization to handle the collateral, which is a credit institution or other legal entity established and operating under Vietnamese law, except where the securing party and the secured party agree on the handling of the security asset in the manner where the secured party itself acknowledges the security asset as a replacement for the performance of the secured obligation.

5. In case enterprises are not allowed to borrow short-term foreign loans

Enterprises not being credit institutions are allowed to borrow short-term foreign loans to pay short-term debts that are obligated to pay within 12 months of signing the foreign loan agreement, but excluding the following cases:

  • Debts arising from loan contracts with residents.
  • Debts arising from purchases of trading securities; contributed capital or shares of another entity; investment real estate and transactions as project transferee.

The draft will replace Circular 12/2014/TT-NHNN and does not apply to foreign loans in the form of goods on deferred sale.

Rate this post

The post Legal Alert | May 2022 appeared first on Global Vietnam Lawyers.



source https://gvlawyers.com.vn/legal-alert-may-2022/

Dialogue in the workplace & democracy regulations

GV Lawyers would like to introduce our valued readers an article by Lawyer Dinh Quang Thuan and Lawyer Hoang Phuoc titled “Dialogue in the workplace & democracy regulations” posted Saigon Economic Times (No 1.641) on 26 May 2022.

***

According to current law, “Dialogue in the workplace” is a must-have procedure in enterprises to build labor relationships, helping employees and employers understand and trust each other. In fact, not all businesses strictly follow this supposedly helpful procedure.

After two years of struggling with the Covid-19 epidemic and witnessing the revenue chart gradually decline without any means of reversing it, a large enterprise in province D decided to restructure its business organization to restore operational efficiency and enhance competitiveness in the market.

The competent authority reminded the enterprise to conduct the “dialogue at work” procedure on workplace-related issues only after the enterprise sent a notice to the local Department of Labor, War Invalids, and Social Affairs by regulations. Until they consult a law firm, businesses in province D still do not comprehend where they are lacking and what they must do.

So, what is “Dialogue in the workplace” that the local labor-management agency reminds businesses to do? Not only large enterprises like D, but indeed many other small and medium-sized businesses, suffer from this shortcoming.

What is the “Dialogue in the workplace”?

“Dialogue in the workplace” is a term defined for the first time in the Labor Code 2012 (“LC 2012”). Accordingly, the Dialogue in the workplace is carried out through direct exchange between employees and employers, or between representatives of the labor collective and employers, in order to share information, enhance understanding between employers and employees to build labor relationships in the workplace.

LC 2012 stipulates that the Dialogue in the workplace is conducted every 3 months, or whenever there is a request from either party. The statutory contents may be brought into dialogue on a wide range, including the employers’ production and business situations, performance of labor contracts, collective labor agreement, internal rules, regulations and other commitments and agreements in the workplace, working conditions, employees’ or labor collectives’ requirements on employers, employers’ requirements on employees and labor collectives, and other matters of interest to the two parties.

The Dialogue in the workplace has been believed to become a useful activity, facilitating exchange and understanding between employers and employees, whereby helping to strike a better balance of the interests of the two parties and avoid conflicts caused by excessive tension. However, the course of implementing LC 2012 (from May 1, 2013 until January 1, 2021 upon its expiry) did not make impressions on or mark the significant results of the Dialogue in the workplace. Perhaps that is why one of the new key points of Labor Code 2019 is the very changes related to the regulations on the activities of the Dialogue in the workplace.

Changes in the Labor Code 2019

First of all, the activities under LC 2012 on the regulation on conducting the Dialogue in the workplace every 3 months are considered too much, costly for employers and may make a dialogue informal with a lack of substance. The Labor Code 2019 (“LC 2019”) was amended by only stipulating that the Dialogue in the workplace is held periodically at least once a year.

In addition to maintaining the Dialogue in the workplace periodically and at the request of either party, LC 2019 supplemented a new regulation on the mandatory organization of the Dialogue in the workplace for the following cases: develop the regulations on assessing the extent of job completion (Article 36); downsize employees in case of any change in structure, technology or economic reasons (Article 42); develop a labor usage plan (Article 44); formulate salary scale, salary table and labor norms (Article 93); decide on bonus regulations (Article 104); promulgate internal labor regulations (Article 118); suspend the employee’s work (Article 128).

Dialogue cannot be separated from Democracy Regulations

In addition to the aforesaid dialogue contents, Decree 145/2020/ND-CP dated December 14, 2020 of the Government detailing and guiding the implementation of a number of articles of the Labor Code on working conditions and labor relationships encourages the parties to dialogue on other matters agreed upon by the parties and specified in the grassroots democracy regulations in the workplace. This is considered a new and key regulation which may change the importance of the Dialogue in the workplace fundamentally. Such change may lead employers to go through more procedures (in order to hold a dialogue in the workplace) before promulgating the regulations on assessing the extent of the job completion by employees across departments, which the company will then rely on to exercise its right to unilaterally terminate the labor contract with employees.

Similarly, the development of a labor usage plan, the retrenchment of employees in the event of a change in structure, technology or for economic reasons, and the issuance of bonus regulations will also have to go through many procedures and are more structured than before.

However, businesses will have to accept following these regulations to ensure compliance and avoid legal risks in the future; for example, if the company unilaterally terminates the labor contract with the employee because the employee regularly fails to complete the work according to the labor contract, but the company has not held the Dialogue in the workplace beforehand in order to exchange opinions with the grassroots representative organization of employees upon developing the regulations on assessing the extent of work completion, such retrenchment may be considered illegal.

The role of Democracy Regulations in conducting dialogue in the workplace

The next issue is how will the employer organize the Dialogue in the workplace, in a manner that he considers appropriate, or must comply with the law?

According to Decree 145/2020, the Dialogue in the workplace must be conducted in accordance with the Democracy Regulations promulgated by the employer himself, which must contain the following main contents: principles of the Dialogue in the workplace; number and dialogue participants of each party; number of times and time to hold an annual dialogue; how to organize a periodical dialogue, a dialogue at the request of either party or the parties, an ad-hoc dialogue; responsibilities of the parties upon participating in the dialogue; application of Article 176 of the Labor Code to the representative members of employees participating in the dialogue, but not members of the leadership of the grassroots representative organization of employees; other content (if any).

Decree 145/2020 also stipulates that upon formulating, amending and supplementing the Democracy Regulations, the employer must consult the grassroots representative organization of employees (if any) and dialogue representative group of employees (if any.) The Democracy Regulations must be publicly communicated to employees.

As such, the Democracy Regulations is the very document that defines the manner in which employers and employees carry out the Dialogue in the workplace, in the cases provided for by law and agreed  between employers and employees (if any).

Conducting the Dialogue in the workplace in the context of absence from or inconsistency with the Democracy Regulations is likely to lead to situations where employers are seen as non-compliant with the law, and may subject to certain sanctions. Therefore, companies are advised to develop and issue the Democracy Regulations as prescribed to serve as a basis for the implementation of the Dialogue in the workplace, when necessary. During the drafting process, the contents of the Democracy Regulations need to be carefully considered and studied to ensure appropriateness for the enterprise situation, avoiding the introduction of the regulations that are not suitable with reality, causing the company and employees to face obstacles upon practical application.

Rate this post

The post Dialogue in the workplace & democracy regulations appeared first on Global Vietnam Lawyers.



source https://gvlawyers.com.vn/dialogue-in-the-workplace-democracy-regulations/

Legal Newsletter Issue No. 5 | May 2022

Dear Valued Customers and Partners,

GV Lawyers would like to introduce you Legal Newsletter Issue No. 05, in May 2022 with the following main contents:

  • We will keep you updated about the novelties on business and use of postal services, on amending and supplementing regulations on granting licenses to import films for non-commercial purposes. In addition, we will help you stay up to date on some solutions to speed up the progress and improve the quality of planning for the period 2021-2030 of Government in the ” Update latest regulations” section.
  • Next, the article “Project of the Law on Cinematography (amended) – “Firm in objectives, flexible in strategies” by Mr. Le Quang Vy, Partner of GV Lawyers will analyze the nature of “firm in objectives and flexible in strategies” in the project of the Law on Cinematography (amended) related to the issue of censorship and appraisal of cinematographic works before they are licensed for dissemination. At the same time, drawing from the experience of South Korea and the United States in censoring cinematic works, the author proposes some solutions for Vietnam to be in harmony with the aspects of state management, human rights, moral rights of the author, and the rights of film producers.
  • Enterprises will be interested in adding regulations on granting red books for condotels and officetels in the draft Decree amending decrees detailing the implementation of the Land Law, as well as the The Ministry of Construction makes a proposal on owning apartments for 50 years in “Good readings for you” section.
  • In the section “Legal Guidance“, we will update the questions related to tax policy such as: (i) Personal income tax of insurance agents; (ii) Value added tax rate for securities business activities; (iii) Expenses paid for by a third company and cleared for debts; and (iv) Invoicing instructions for the time a customer cancels the contract.
  • The last part of the Legal Newsletter is, as usual, the list of selected legal documents issued in April 2022.

We hope you will find this newsletter useful. To read the full Legal Newsletter, please click DOWNLOAD.

Rate this post

The post Legal Newsletter Issue No. 5 | May 2022 appeared first on Global Vietnam Lawyers.



source https://gvlawyers.com.vn/legal-newsletter-issue-no-5-may-2022/

Legal Newsletter | May 2023

Dear Valued Customers and Partners, GV Lawyers would like to introduce you to Legal Newsletter Issue No. 05 of May 2023 . This newslette...